Oh, I am afraid all my words are too late, this terrible chloral poisoning is unpredictable in its consequences. Judging by the letters I have received, I know that you are being misinformed about my brother from all sides, nobody knows the history of his life and his suffering as well as I do. It will be very difficult for you to form an opinion about his suffering. Will you gently refer him to Kant? But my brother is still young, he can still overcome everything and return to his work with renewed energy. God bless you, dear highly revered Prof.
- The End of Empire in French West Africa: Frances Successful Decolonization?.
- Within Nietzsche's Labyrinth!
- A Fugitive Truth.
- Friedrich Nietzsche.
- Nonlinear Time Series: Semiparametric and Nonparametric Methods (Chapman & Hall/CRC Monographs on Statistics & Applied Probability).
- J-Contractive Matrix Valued Functions and Related Topics (Encyclopedia of Mathematics and its Applications).
It is in effect her first biography of her brother. If he had not fallen down the stone steps he would probably still be alive today. Naturally, as in the case of the diagnosis of hereditary factors in the Jena clinic, it is the doctors who are at fault: their morphine injections nearly sent the young man to his grave in , and in the early s they prescribed chloral as a sedative. Sandberg seems to hint as much between the lines. On the pseudonyms mentioned in the next sentence, see Janz, III, 26— Crime and Punishment , pt. My references are to the edition.
II, — The two parts of volume II are paginated consecutively.
- ISBN 13: 9780415903288!
- Services on Demand.
- Most Downloaded Articles.
- How to Write Essays and Dissertations: A Guide for English Literature Students!
- Evolutionary Epistemology and Scientific Realism.
It might have been the one in question. Otherwise the last letter would be the one dated mid-November, , printed as the final one in the complete edition of the Briefwechsel edited by Giorgio Colli and Mazzino Montinari [3. See n.
The wording of the sentences quoted is different from that of the 23 March letter published below. But consider the letter of 23 March , published below. Extract: Volz, ; draft among the Sandberg papers in the Countway Library.
The typescript was checked against the manuscript and corrected by Hans Gebhardt, Eckersdorf. Peter J. Burgard Charlottesville, VA and London, , 42— This view is shared by Peters, Janz, and many others. For the opposite view, see, e. Wolff, Friedrich Nietzsche Bern, , You can suggest to your library or institution to subscribe to the program OpenEdition Freemium for books. Feel free to give our address: contact openedition. We will be glad to provide it with information about OpenEdition and its subscription offers.
Thank you. We will forward your request to your library as soon as possible. OpenEdition is a web platform for electronic publishing and academic communication in the humanities and social sciences. Desktop version Mobile version. Results per book Results per chapter.
Exploring the Interior
Open Book Publishers. Revelation or Deceit? The universe within. Search inside the book. Table of contents. Cite Share. Cited by. Text Notes. Full text. Breakdown in Turin 1 Oscar Wilde in chains on the platform of Clapham Junction; Rimbaud smuggling firearms in Abyssinia while Paris is in ecstasy about his Illuminations ; Nietzsche, tears streaming down his cheeks, embracing a fiacre horse in downtown Turin as insanity descends upon him — these scandalous incidents, tailor-made for the boulevard press though they are, also sound an alarm in the wider landscape of the cultural history of the time.
Medical opinion and The wording of the sentences quoted is different from that of the Extract: Volz, ; draft among the Sandberg The typescr On the whole we should consider this as right and proper although it may result in insecurity for the coming century and compel everyone to bear arms. There is thereby a counterforce which continually reminds us that there is no exclusively moral—making morality and that a morality which asserts itself to the exclusion of all other morality destroys too much sound strength and is too dearly bought by mankind.
The non—conventional and deviating people who are so often productive and inventive must no longer be sacrificed: it must never again be considered as a disgrace to depart from morality either in actions or thought; many new experiments must be made upon life and society and the world must be relieved from a huge weight of bad conscience.
These general aims must be recognised and encouraged by all those upright people who are seeking truth. A Morality which does not bore one The principal moral commandments which a nation permits its teachers to emphasise again and again stand in relation to its chief defects and that is why it does not find them tiresome. The Greeks who so often failed to employ moderation coolness fair—mindedness and rationality in general turned a willing ear to the four Socratic virtues—they stood in such need of them and yet had so little talent for them! At the Parting of the Ways Shame!
You wish to form part of a system in which you must be a wheel fully and completely or risk being crushed by wheels! Where it is understood that each one will be that which his superiors make of him! Where the seeking for "connections "will form part of one's natural duties! Do not stand on ceremony"! Unconditional Homage When I think of the most read German philosopher the most popular German musician and the most distinguished German statesman I cannot but acknowledge that life is now rendered unusually arduous for these Germans this nation of unconditional sentiments and that too by their own great men.
We see three magnificent spectacles spread out before us: on each occasion there is a river rushing along in the bed which it has made for itself and even so agitated that one thinks at times it intends to flow uphill. And yet however we might admire Schopenhauer who would not all things considered like to have other opinions than his?
Alan White, Within Nietzsche's Labyrinth - PhilPapers
Who in all greater and smaller things would now share the opinions of Richard Wagner although there may be truth in the view expressed by someone: viz that wherever Wagner gave or took offence some problem lay hidden—which however he did not unearth for us. And finally how many are there who would be willing and eager to agree with Bismarck if only he could always agree with himself or were even to show some signs of doing so for the future!
It is true that it is by no means astonishing to find statesmen without principles but with dominant instincts; a versatile mind actuated by these dominant and violent instincts and hence without principles—these qualities are looked upon as reasonable and natural in a statesman. Yet alas this has up to the present been so un-German; as un-German as the fuss made about music and the discord and bad temper excited around the person of the musician; or as un-German as the new and extraordinary position taken up by Schopenhauer: he did not feel himself to be either above things or on his knees before them—one or other of these alternatives might still have been German—but he assumed an attitude against things!
How incredible and disagreeable!
Nietzsche’s Intuitive Movement in a Labyrinth of Contradictions and Masks
And what again can he do with three such examples who cannot keep the peace towards one another! Here we see Schopenhauer as the antagonist of Wagner's music Wagner attacking Bismarck's politics and Bismarck attacking Wagnerism and Schopenhauerism. What remains for us to do? Where shall we flee with our thirst for wholesale hero—worship! Would it not be possible to choose from the music of the musician a few hundred bars of good music which appealed to the heart and which we should like to take to heart because they are inspired by the heart—could we not stand aside with this small piece of plunder and forget the rest?
And could we not make a similar compromise as regards the philosopher and the statesman—select take to heart and in particular forget the rest? Yes if only forgetfulness were not so difficult! There was once a very proud man who would never on any account accept anything good or evil from others—from any one indeed but himself. When he wanted to forget however he could not bestow this gift upon himself and was three times compelled to conjure up the spirits.
They came listened to his desire and said at last "This is the only thing it is not in our power to give! Why then should the spirits be conjured up? It is useless. We never forget what we endeavour to forget. And how great would be the "balance "which we should have to forget if we wished henceforth to continue wholesale admirers of these three great men! It would therefore be far more advisable to profit by the excellent opportunity offered us to try something new i.
We must come to learn in the first place however that unconditional homage to people is something rather ridiculous that a change of view on this point would not discredit even Germans and that there is a profound and memorable saying: "Ce qui importe ce ne sont point les personnes: mais les choses". This saying is like the man who uttered it—great honest simple and silent—just like Carnot the soldier and Republican. Yet may I at the present time speak thus to Germans of a Frenchman and a Republican into the bargain? Perhaps not: perhaps I must not even recall what Niebuhr in his time dared to say to the Germans: that no one had made such an impression of true greatness upon him as Carnot.
He exhibits the most widespread and artless pleasure in everything typical in men and events and finds that each type is possessed of a certain quantity of good sense: it is this good sense which he seeks to discover. He likewise exhibits a larger amount of practical justice than Plato; he never reviles or belittles those men whom he dislikes or who have in any way injured him in the course of his life.
On the contrary: while seeing only types he introduces something noble and additional into all things and persons; for what could posterity to which he dedicates his work do with things not typical! Thus this culture of the disinterested knowledge of the world attains in him the poet—thinker a final marvellous bloom—this culture which has its poet in Sophocles its statesman in Pericles its doctor in Hippocrates and its natural philosopher in Democritus: this culture which deserves to be called by the name of its teachers the Sophists and which unhappily from the moment of its baptism at once begins to grow pale and incomprehensible to us—for henceforward we suspect that this culture which was combated by Plato and all the Socratic schools must have been very immoral!
The truth of this matter is so complicated and entangled that we feel unwilling to unravel it: so let the old error error veritate simplicior run its old course.